Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. was argued on April 28, 2021.

This case asks the following important question: Does Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, which holds that public school officials may regulate speech that would materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school, apply to student speech that occurs off campus?

B.L. was a student at Mahanoy Area High School. B.L. made the junior varsity (JV) cheerleading squad her freshman year and hoped to be named to the varsity team for her sophomore year. She was very disappointed when the teams were announced, and she was placed on the JV team again.

On Saturday from off-campus, B.L. posted two snaps on Snapchat. B.L.’s first snap was a picture of B.L. and a friend with their middle fingers raised, tongues sticking out, and the caption, “F*** school f*** softball f*** cheer f*** everything” (Note: B.L. did not use *** and wrote out the full word). Shortly after B.L. posted another text-only snap that read, “Love how me and [name of student] get told we need a year of jv before we make varsity but that doesn’t matter to anyone else? [upside down smiling emoji]” The snaps reached about 250 friends, which included other students and members of the cheerleading team. A screenshot was taken of the snap by a classmate and shared with the coaches.

The coaches determined that B.L.’s conduct violated the team’s rules of conduct and removed her from the team for the school year. The coaching staff told B.L. that she could try out again the next year. B.L. faced no further disciplinary action. The principal, athletic director, and school board supported the coaches’ decision to remove B.L. from the team.

B.L. and her parents sued Mahanoy Area School District. They alleged that B.L.’s First Amendment right to free speech was violated because the school disciplined her for off-campus speech. The District Court granted B.L. an injunction to be reinstated on the team, declaratory relief, expungement of her record, and some monetary damages. They said that even if Tinker v. Des Moines applied to off-campus speech, this situation was not sufficiently disruptive to the school to warrant the school’s response.

The school district appealed this decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. This court agreed with the District Court’s ruling but for different reasons. They did not rule on whether the snaps were disruptive enough to be disciplined. Instead, they ruled that Tinker v. Des Moines does not apply to off-campus speech. The school district asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear this case, and they agreed.

Case Materials

(Note: you will be prompted to create a Street Law store web account and "check out" in order to download these free materials.) 


Oral Argument



Classroom Guide to Moot Courts

This free Street Law resource is the perfect companion to our SCOTUS in the Classroom case materials. The 10-lesson-plan guide supports teachers in implementing moot courts in their classrooms. The lessons help set the stage for a successful moot court experience—from understanding the appellate process to granting to judicial opinion writing to evaluation tools.

Download Classroom Guide