1 item added to your cart
Street Law, Inc. and The Supreme Court Historical Society present
Street Law /
Landmark Cases /
Regents of the U. of California v. Bakke
" . . . Race or ethnic background may be deemed a "plus" in a particular applicant's file, yet it does not insulate the individual from comparison with all other candidates for the available seats." — Justice Powell, Speaking for the Court
In the early 1970s, the medical school of the University of California at Davis devised a dual admissions program to increase representation of disadvantaged minority students. Allan Bakke was a white male who applied to and was rejected from the regular admissions program, while minority applicants with lower grade point averages and testing scores were admitted under the specialty admissions program. Bakke filed suit, alleging that this admissions system violated the Equal Protection Clause and excluded him on the basis of race. The Supreme Court found for Bakke against the rigid use of racial quotas, but also established that race was a permissible criteria among several others.
These materials were developed for students of various skill levels, and teachers should choose the level that works best for their students. Answers to the background questions, vocabulary, and activities can be found in the FOR TEACHERS ONLY tab under each case.
After the Case
* Answers to the background questions, vocabulary, and activities can be found in the FOR TEACHERS ONLY tab under each case.
This section contains answers and tips for differentiated instruction for select activities. To gain access, simply sign in.
If you are new to LandmarkCases.org and don't already have an account, please create one. You will then complete your registration by filling out a brief registration form.
Contact: If you have questions/problems registering or accessing the teacher only materials, please contact Christina Barnett (firstname.lastname@example.org, 240.821.1324).
© 2010 Street Law, Inc. and The Supreme Court Historical Society.
This site has been developed through the collaboration of teachers, attorneys, law students, Street Law, and the Supreme Court Historical Society. For more details see the site credits.